My next attempt will set the Y-offset to. There is also a list of supported scanners. If youve never used VueScan, you can get more information from the VueScan Manual. You can get more information in the Release Notes. (4/5) Platforms: Windows / Mac OS / Linux.
I thought because the 7th frame is back to a 'zero' Y-position, the Y-offset would compensate for this, but the program actually treats the parallel strips as though they are one long continuous strip. VueScan 9.8.05 was released on June 7, 2023, and you can read about whats new in this version.
UPDATE: by the time I got to the 12th frame I could see there was a very slight offset problem. These settings seem to have finally done the trick! Hope they work for you. I'm always having some offset problem otherwise - losing a millimeter sliver at each end of the scan - usually not enough for me to finally decide to knuckle down and test different measurements. My eyes popped-out when I saw this thread title, as it's a consistent problem that I sat down and decided to work out myself this very evening - I'm currently on frame 6 of a 12-batch scan testing whether my settings are now correct (so far so good).ĭoes the LS-5000 have the same holders as the 9000? If so - these are the settings I'm batch-scanning with right now (I simply set the scan area itself to be slightly larger in every direction than the image area). by doing a Preview) the distance between the frames and set that somewhere under the Crop tab? If there is no such setting, can one for each roll somehow have the program calculate (eg. When batch scanning strips, is there some setting that ensures that the whole frame is captured in a strip? I find that even if I center the first frame properly there's a gradual shift in what the program captures so the last few frames in a strip have parts clipped.
0 kommentar(er)
